Insert answers below.
The first general feature of crime is that there has to be an act in violation of the law. What act was committed in violation of the law?
Murder was the act committed in violation of the law.
A guilty mind is the second general feature that has to be established and is probably the most complex because it involves subjective evaluation of the mind. Should the Zodiac be held to blame for this crime? Did the Zodiac intend the consequences of his or her actions? The actual zodiac should not be held to blame for this crime. The zodiac did perhaps intend the consequences of his actions. He even informed the media about his actions. Concurrence
The third element is the concurrence of the act and the intent. Were the Zodiac’s actions linked with the intent?
The zodiac’s actions liked the intent.
The harm in this case, the death of another human being, is easily identified. What is the harm caused by the Zodiac killer?
Commit murderous acts on couples while making the other spouse watch while other is being killed Causation
There has to be a link between the act and the harm.
What is the link between the act and the harm?
The zodiac killer would warn them first and would then send evidence of his killings to the media and would inform that he’d strike again Legality
There has to be a law on the books to punish someone for his or her behavior. What law is on the books that the Zodiac would be punished for?
Murder plus the Capital Punishment
Not only must there be a law on the books, but that law must provide a punishment for the crime. Statutory punishments for murder are among the severest punishments available to judges. What is the punishment for murder in California?
Five years to life without the possibility of parole nor death Necessary attendant circumstances
This element refers to the facts surrounding the incident. Even if each of the statutory elements can be established, a defendant has the opportunity to raise defenses that could excuse his or her actions. What would the Zodiac argue regarding a defense?
DNA was not a match nor was there any evidence